What's New?

The Epstein Party
2/16/26

US Attorney General Pam Bondi pictured here ignoring rape victims because the rapist was friends with the president

At one point in my life, I voted Republican. Before Trump, the party had legitimacy in my mind. I was in my early 20's and hated nanny state ideals. You may know what I'm talking about but I'll give you an example anyway.

Say a bunch of scientists notice that Soda Pop is unhealthy. Rather than simply educate the public, a nanny state goes the extra mile and starts taxing the stuff BECAUSE it's unhealthy. They'll start preventing children from buying the stuff, despite the fact that it should be up to the parents whether or not a child can drink a Pepsi. It's reasonable with something like cigarettes or alcohol, but to take it any further is an infringement on peoples rights. There's no reason why someone shouldn't be able to have a beer at the beach. The excuse in those cases is "it creates litter". If someone litters, fine them. I've discussed nanny state bullshit in the past, and my views on that crap haven't changed. It's not the governments job to protect my children from the world. It's mine. Just like it's my job to teach them how to protect themselves. Not only that, we need to live and let live. If someone ones to smoke a cigarette or drinks a coke, that's neither my problem nor my business.

I wouldn't always vote Republican, I still had a hard line against openly racist dickheads. I'm not the type of person to lump large groups of people into a single category, it didn't make sense to me to condemn racism and then simultaneously condemn and entire group of people simply because a few of them suck complete ass. I'd also avoid voting for complete idiots, regardless of party.

Complete idiots seems to define the Republican party now. I say "seem" because again, I don't know every Republican, and it's stupid to paint with a broad brush. Recently, one of these people tried as hard as they could to convince me that all trans people are pedophiles. The argument was as such: If they're allowed to use the bathroom with your daughter, they'll rape her. First of all, I treat every single person I don't know with the assumption that they might harm my child in some way. That's something I think every parent does. Whether or not they're trans is irrelevant. When I explained this, it seemingly bounced off of the woman's skull. Whenever my daughter uses a public bathroom, I check it first, then let her in. I guard the entrance until she leaves. No exceptions there. I've pissed a lot of people off doing this and won't stop. Again, I'm not going to rely on someone else to do something that I should be doing if I can do it.

The thing is, a pedophile isn't going to create some elaborate scheme to commit said crime. They rely on whatever power they have, and exploit it. Often, they take ample time to build up that power. Pedos usually know the children they're victimizing. They're scout leaders, pastors, authority figures, or someone else the child already knows and trusts. Look at Jeffery Epstein. That's exactly how he operated, and he did it did pretty openly. Not only did he rely on his power and influence to get close to his victims, he used it to silence people that would have exposed him. The current President of the United States is and was fully aware of everything that went on. In fact, the files we have now give one the impression that he was in on it.

Knowing this, It's stupid to assume that a pedo would dress like a woman and hide in women's bathrooms just to rape little girls. They don't have to go to that trouble. Frankly, I think their fictional scenario is a red herring. Pedos are going to rely on power and opportunity and I can't think of a group with less power than the Trans community. They're constantly being told this and that about themselves by people that know nothing about them. I don't have anything to add for or against. I just think that again: we should let people do what they want to do without judgement so long as it isn't victimizing others. Plenty of republicans have harmed my family and the same cannot be said about trans people.

For those of you not paying attention, the fact that the Doland has been mentioned in the Epstein Files thousands of times is a pretty clear indicator that he was involved with Jeffery Epstein's sick shenanigans. Now, the Republican party is going out of it's way to protect him from consequences. In fact, at least half a dozen of Trump's cabinet members are also mentioned to have been involved with Jeffery Epstein in some capacity.

And yet, the Republican party does nothing to condemn these people. In fact, they're actively trying to protect them. The only logical through-line here is that they're more concerned about protecting Trump, a man where evidence of his horrific crimes is growing daily. Not only that, but Trump himself is protecting his cabinet members who have been named in the files as "having meetings with" Epstein years after his initial conviction. These people definitely felt the need to lie about the connection. Why lie if you "didn't know"? Ironically enough, in trying to protect Trump, they make him look even more guilty.

We have a party and DOJ that is actively defending a man that was friends with Jeffery Epstein, hiding and lying about the remaining Epstein files to prevent political issues from cropping up for Doland, and actively dismissing and intimidating the victims. All while simultaneously attempting to create a red herring in trans people. None of this is accidental. None of it. While there could be an alternate explanation, the republicans aren't offering it.

For the rest of my life, I don't think I'll be voting Republican. The association with pedophilia is way, way, beyond anything that I'm willing to overlook. I can't even look at people I know that are republicans the same way. It doesn't change things much because again, every adult is a threat to my kids in some capacity, but it's still rather eye opening. For the longest time, it was solely an opposition to Trump and anyone that supported him. Now? It's the entire god damned thing. Simply having an (R) next to your name is enough for me to say "yeah, no". Thomas Massie and a few others are openly working with Democrats to expose what happened with Epstein to the public, but it isn't enough. The entire party should be getting behind those efforts.

When it comes to the safety of children, there's not "oh, let's wait and see". There's no "let's wait for the judges to figure it out". There's no "maybe". If there's even one marble in the "is" jar, then the whole things is compromised. There are a hell of a lot of marbles in that "is" jar even if it isn't full. That's too much for me, and if it isn't for you, I'd like to ask you why. Actually, I don't want to know why. As far as I'm concerned, you're part of the problem. There are lines that cannot be crossed, and this dances all over it.

I've been a registered independent since I was 18. I've voted for both parties candidates multiple times. I'm updating my party affiliation. I'd much rather be associated with a bunch of whiney dorks that cry like little girls whenever they smell cigarette smoke than ever support a group of pedo defenders. That's common sense, I'd think.

Also, I'm aware of the nonsense Pam Bondi released recently to attempt to muddy the waters. I'm not even going to acknowledge it beyond the fact that I know it exists and that it's obvious bullshit. Don't waste my time nor your own. The only trick these sickos seem to have at this point is finger pointing and distractions.